Monday, August 29, 2016

Should You Nature Journal from Photos?

click image to enlarge
Should you nature journal from photos? 

Interesting question, right? Actually, I thought I'd left that whole "working from photos" controversy behind when I gave up plein air painting (that's the practice of painting outdoors, directly in front of your subject, as opposed to painting in the studio from either a photo or your own field studies or both).

Why is this even a question? 

It's a question because people have mixed feelings about this and it keeps coming up. This very question was asked recently in a group I participate in, and it gave me that same sinking feeling that I used to get in the plein air groups I participated in when this discussion would inevitably come up.

So, What's Going On?

This is what I observe. First, there's a group of people who work from photos and really, really want to justify that. They work from photos because it's easier to work from photos, and because it's easier to draw from photos, they're happier with their results. Fair enough, we want making art to make us happy.

I think we all realize that much of the hard work of translating a 3D object into a 2D image is done for you by the camera. So, better results are almost guaranteed, no surprise there.

Photos also hold still, and with a click of the mouse we can zoom in to observe detail to a painstaking degree. Photos can be marked with a grid to help get proportions correct, traced, and any number of other techniques that help you draw.

If your observation and drawing skills are weak then working from a photo will fill in a lot of those gaps.

Yet, I often get the sense that these folks feel guilty, because they realize that if they had better observation and drawing skills they wouldn't need to work from a photo. So they're a little defensive (OK sometimes a lot).

There's another group who are the purists. They will never, ever, ever use a photo and will be pretty vocal about that and condemning of people who do use photos. Do you see why I get a stomach ache whenever this issue comes up?

So how does this fit in with nature journaling? 

These are just my opinions so take them with a grain of salt.

Nature journaling is about interacting with and observing the natural world. I think much of the benefit of keeping a nature journal is lost when you work from photos. From a broader art making perspective I think it is always a hundred times better to work from life (no matter what your subject is) than to work from a photo.

Copying from a photo is one of the surest ways to suck the liveliness and truth out of your work leaving you with a dead, dull rendition of your subject. It takes many years of working from life to be able to use a photo reference wisely.

Is it Ever OK to Use Photos?

Of course. The page above is a perfect example. I was absolutely taken by surprise by a fox at a local park. She was literally right there, she didn't seem to mind my presence, and walked right in front of me as she crossed the parking lot to enter the meadow to hunt. I followed her and was able to observe from a fairly close distance. She ignored me and went on with her hunting, (and if you've ever watch a fox hunt you know how absolutely adorable they are when they pounce!).

Needless to say I was pretty excited, and began literally scribbling down her movements. I mean look at the sketches on the left hand page. They are nothing more than ridiculously bad gesture sketches done in seconds flat. But... they are very authentic. They recall for me my excitement, her quickness, and did I mention my excitement?

I also snapped a few photos with my phone. While the fox was still there in the meadow, and after I had filled the first page with gesture sketches, I did the two more developed sketches on the right, by both directly observing the fox and referring to my phone photos. That, basically, is how I use photos, as supplements to direct observation.

Here's the Rub

Even after thirty years of being an artist, I still struggle with other people judging my work and comparing it to other people's work. I thought when I began to focus solely on nature journaling and sketchbook work that I'd be in an arena where everyone was working pretty much directly from life. I thought that the value of rapid, gestural, lively sketches done on the spot would be appreciated and understood.

That's not the case though, and I find it difficult sometimes to remember that not everyone is going to understand that some of the really amazing "sketches" that they see online were actually done from photos, and that working from life is a very different genre with different qualities that make it amazing.

Stay True to your Call

I don't particularly like to work from photos, unless I'm really focusing on a bird, or animal  and I need time to deconstruct its anatomy, markings etc by making drawings from photos, so that when I see it in the field I have a knowledge base to dip into as I'm sketching. I'm not interested in doing scientific, bird or botanical illustrations. I'm all about the gesture!

What I do love is being outside, and the challenge of sketching directly from life, even if the result is only a very quick, scribbly gesture study like the foxes above. I don't particularly like knowing that viewers are comparing sketches I have done in a matter of minutes directly from a moving subject outdoors to someone else's sketch done from a photo that took hours to complete.

To help with that I continually remind myself why I value the approach I've chosen. I really, truly do believe that working from life is the best possible way to approach nature journaling. It certainly brings me the most joy.

At the end of the day I love what I do. I value each and every sketch, the more developed ones, the scribbly ones, the half-finished-because-the-subject-ran-off ones, the really "bad" ones that I try not to think of as "bad". I've made a commitment to myself to value and honor all my sketches for what they are: glorious experiences of the natural world, honestly recorded in the moment.

Own your Process

I think it's important to own your process. If you work from photos, understand your reasons for doing so and say so when you discuss your work publicly. If you work from life, accept that your sketches are going to reflect the rough and tumble excitement, motion and inaccuracies that working in the field produces. Love what you do and how you do it. Don't judge or worry about what others are doing.(easier said than done, I know).

Making art should make you happy. Being in nature should make you happy. I made up my mind long ago to make that a reality in my life. How about you?


Don't forget, Thursday is a guest post from Lynn Seddon, author of Exploring Nature with Children.

Click HERE for a free nature journaling mini-class, and stay tuned for my upcoming online course Beginning a Nature Journal: creating lively sketches of the natural world coming in spring 2017

8 comments:

  1. Wonderful post. I do hope that internet viewers acknowledge differences between drawing on location and drawing from photos. For myself, I don't like drawing from photos for the reasons you mention. I was a walker long before I was a sketcher and to me, sketching is about connecting with my environment, not creating pretty pictures. --- Larry

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes! Always about connecting with the environment, so important to the work we do in our sketchbooks.

      Delete
  2. Thanks for this post Jan. Why is comparison such an issue with us? I love your free sketching and wish I could be more that way. (See? I am comparing again). Like you said, it is important to decide and own what your journaling is about and what your process is, and why. I get overwhelmed by all the journal styles you can find on the internet. Each style has something beautiful about it and shows the personality of the artist. Each one is unique. But there is no way I can "copy" them. You have inspired me to do some more thinking about my process and what style I want to use in which journals. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fay, It's always hard not to compare. It takes quite a bit of fortitude to stay true to yourself. When i look back at drawings i did in high school, basically before i had any training they look very similar in style to what I do now. I spent a looong time studying art in college and learning to draw using different methods which basically tried to change the way I drew naturally. I'm glad I learned different drawing methods but I'm even more glad that I have returned to my own natural way of drawing.

      Delete
  3. Thank you for putting into words what I've felt for a long time! This post helped me immensely decide what I do and don't like about my sketchbooks and why. And validated and clarified my feelings about why and how I sketch.
    I'm not proficient with drawing or watercolors but I get a thrill seeing paint spread on paper. I also get a thrill when I paint outside and get-it-down fast. Which I love to do. But the results always look like your left hand page. (no offense meant). I go back later and see these pages and remember clearly the whole day...but the page is, um, sort of ugly.
    When I paint neat, fussy watercolors from photos, I'm not so engaged and I'm never really pleased while doing them. BUT, when I go back later, I'm amazed I did such a great job! And that makes me happy.
    So your post here helped me see that I'm either happy while sketching and painting (outside) or happy later (from photos).
    Just writing this to you opened my eyes to my choices....maybe it's OK to do both kinds, just remember the difference.
    Does that make sense?
    Sorry this was so looong winded, I think it was great therapy. So, BIG thank you!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Susie, Thanks so much for you thoughtful comment. Keep focusing on the "thrill" that's really all that matters. And "yes" it's OK to make two (or more) different kinds or styles of art. That's what all highly creative people do!

      Delete
  4. So many good points here! I too love painting from life...and that's what I usually find myself doing. There are only a few times when I resort to photos to explore something that was impossible on location, and in the chaos & commotion I resort to simply being still & observing. (and if I'm lucky, take a photo for a later reference - I'm thinking of my recent trip to Great Gull Island, where I felt constantly under attack of birds....truly Hitchcock like experience, ha!). But my happiest self is outdoors with my own time agenda.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Roxanne...Hitchcock like, Oh MY! I remember being in Florida at the beach and having some enormous gulls swoop down and snatch the french fries I had just bought right out of my hands. Pretty bold and a little terrifying! Happiest self = outdoors and with your own agenda I totally get that. :-D

    ReplyDelete

Please leave a comment! It makes me Happy!